GeForce GT 745A vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When comparing GeForce GT 745A and Iris Plus Graphics 655, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 745A and Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GT 745A
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 745A has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GT 745A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GT 745A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 745A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 745A is 537 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GT 745A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 745A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 240% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 80% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 31% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 128% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than GeForce GT 745A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GK107 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 August 2013 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.28 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 26 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |