GeForce GTS 360M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 360M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 360M will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTS 360M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 360M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M or Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)
38 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-II
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 360M has 153% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 1136 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
1−2
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
60−65
190−200
medium / 768p
27−30
160−170
ultra / 1080p
7−8
85−90
QHD / 1440p
−
45−50
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
16−18
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
10−11
85−90
ultra / 1080p
0−1
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
85−90
medium / 1080p
0−1
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
0−1
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
low / 768p
18−20
75−80
medium / 768p
−
65−70
high / 1080p
0−1
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
−
95−100
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 720p
8−9
50−55
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
0−1
45−50
medium / 768p
−
27−30
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
30−35
high / 768p
12−14
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture
GT2xx
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
N11E-GS1
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
7 January 2010
1 September 2017
Pipelines
96
48
Core clock speed
1436 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
727 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
50.40
Floating-point performance
275.71 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory bandwidth
57.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.1
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Gigaflops
413
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price