GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Iris Plus Graphics 655, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 1230 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 191% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 147% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 187% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 204% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Architecture | Turing | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | TU117 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 570
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla M6
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon RX 570
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Tesla M6
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 485M
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M