GeForce GTX 275 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 275 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 275 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 1360% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTX 275 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 1104 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
27−30
medium / 1080p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 275 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
190−200
medium / 768p
100−110
160−170
ultra / 1080p
50−55
85−90
QHD / 1440p
27−30
45−50
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
75−80
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
85−90
ultra / 1080p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
8−9
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
4K / 2160p
3−4
5−6
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
60−65
85−90
medium / 1080p
21−24
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
QHD / 1440p
1−2
7−8
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
50−55
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
65−70
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
4−5
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
6−7
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
95−100
medium / 1080p
90−95
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
30−35
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
24−27
45−50
medium / 768p
16−18
27−30
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
40−45
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
high / 768p
35−40
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
GT200B
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
15 January 2009
1 September 2017
Pipelines
240
48
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
50.40
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
3.0
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
