GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Plus Graphics 655, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 280
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 1473% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 996 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GT200 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 240 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M