GeForce GTX 285 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 285 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 1260% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 285 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTX 285 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 285 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 1176 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
27−30
medium / 1080p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
190−200
medium / 768p
110−120
160−170
ultra / 1080p
55−60
85−90
QHD / 1440p
30−35
45−50
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
85−90
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
85−90
ultra / 1080p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
8−9
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
20−22
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
60−65
85−90
medium / 1080p
24−27
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
QHD / 1440p
1−2
7−8
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
65−70
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
5−6
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
7−8
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
95−100
medium / 1080p
90−95
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
30−35
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
24−27
45−50
medium / 768p
16−18
27−30
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
30−35
high / 768p
35−40
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
GT200B
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
23 December 2008
1 September 2017
Pipelines
240
48
Core clock speed
1476 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
51.8 billion/sec
50.40
Floating-point performance
708.5 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
512 Bit
Memory clock speed
1242 MHz
Memory bandwidth
159.0 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Quick Sync
+
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price
