GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Plus Graphics 655. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Plus Graphics 655. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1826% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 942 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 163% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GT200B | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 240 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M