GeForce GTX 460 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)
160 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
6-pin & 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
768 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 460 has 966% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 460 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTX 460 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 460 is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 is 375 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 460 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
20−22
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 460 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
190−200
medium / 768p
150−160
160−170
ultra / 1080p
75−80
85−90
QHD / 1440p
45−50
45−50
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−33
high / 768p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
medium / 768p
80−85
85−90
ultra / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
30−33
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
80−85
85−90
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
16−18
QHD / 1440p
5−6
7−8
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
65−70
high / 1080p
21−24
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
high / 1080p
7−8
8−9
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−11
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
95−100
95−100
medium / 1080p
100−110
100−110
GeForce GTX 460 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
45−50
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
40−45
45−50
medium / 768p
24−27
27−30
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
low / 768p
95−100
95−100
medium / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
GF104
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
12 July 2010
1 September 2017
Pipelines
336
48
Core clock speed
675 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
37.80
50.40
Floating-point performance
907.2 gflops
Length
8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
3600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
+
Bus support
16x PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
