GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Plus Graphics 655, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 1000 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GF104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 288 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 485M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M