GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Plus Graphics 655, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 966% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 479 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GF114 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 336 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M