GeForce GTX 670MX vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 670MX and Iris Plus Graphics 655 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 670MX will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 670MX and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX and Iris Plus Graphics 655 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX or Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 670MX has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 670MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 670MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670MX is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
20−22
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 670MX and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
190−200
medium / 768p
130−140
160−170
ultra / 1080p
65−70
85−90
QHD / 1440p
35−40
45−50
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
95−100
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
65−70
85−90
ultra / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
85−90
medium / 1080p
30−33
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
3−4
7−8
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
60−65
75−80
medium / 768p
50−55
65−70
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
24−27
medium / 1080p
8−9
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
95−100
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
35−40
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
24−27
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
30−35
45−50
medium / 768p
21−24
27−30
high / 1080p
10−12
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−35
high / 768p
40−45
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
N13E-GR
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
1 October 2012
1 September 2017
Pipelines
960
48
Core clock speed
600 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
48.0 billion/sec
50.40
Floating-point performance
1,154 gflops
Memory bus width
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
67.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
960
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
