GRID K140Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K140Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K140Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K140Q
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 766% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 625% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 108% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2400% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1500% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | GK107 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 September 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |