GRID K220Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When comparing GRID K220Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K220Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K220Q
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 314% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 88% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 180% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | GK104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 1 September 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |