GRID K260Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

When choosing between GRID K260Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K260Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655.

GRID K260Q

Iris Plus Graphics 655 Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:

Iris Plus Graphics 655 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K260Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
QHD / 1440p	3−4	2−3
low / 720p	30−35	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	7−8	4−5
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	27−30	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K260Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	190−200
medium / 768p	180−190	160−170
ultra / 1080p	95−100	85−90
QHD / 1440p	50−55	45−50
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	140−150	120−130
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p	110−120	100−110
medium / 768p	90−95	85−90
ultra / 1080p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p	18−20	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
4K / 2160p	6−7	5−6
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	18−20	16−18
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	95−100	85−90
medium / 1080p	50−55	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	20−22	16−18
QHD / 1440p	9−10	7−8
low / 720p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	27−30	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p	85−90	75−80
medium / 768p	75−80	65−70
high / 1080p	30−33	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
QHD / 1440p	3−4	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p	9−10	8−9
ultra / 1080p	7−8	6−7
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	24−27
medium / 1080p	12−14	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	95−100
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 5% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	18−20	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	50−55
medium / 1080p	24−27	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	24−27
medium / 1080p	16−18	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p	55−60	45−50
medium / 768p	30−35	27−30
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−12	9−10
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
medium / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	30−35
high / 768p	50−55	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name	GK104	Kaby Lake GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	1 September 2017
Pipelines	1536	48
Core clock speed	745 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1200 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	50.40
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares