GRID M10 8Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

When choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655.

GRID M10 8Q

Iris Plus Graphics 655 Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:

Iris Plus Graphics 655 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID M10 8Q	Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID M10 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 733 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
QHD / 1440p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	16−18
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
QHD / 1440p	4−5	4−5
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	45−50	45−50
medium / 1080p	21−24	21−24
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	190−200	190−200
medium / 768p	160−170	160−170
ultra / 1080p	85−90	85−90
QHD / 1440p	50−55	45−50
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	120−130	120−130
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 0% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
medium / 768p	85−90	85−90
ultra / 1080p	55−60	55−60
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
4K / 2160p	5−6	5−6
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	90−95	85−90
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	18−20	16−18
QHD / 1440p	7−8	7−8
low / 720p	45−50	45−50
medium / 1080p	24−27	24−27
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p	75−80	75−80
medium / 768p	70−75	65−70
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	10−11
QHD / 1440p	1−2	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p	8−9	8−9
ultra / 1080p	6−7	6−7
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	24−27
medium / 1080p	10−12	10−12
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	95−100
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	21−24	21−24
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p	12−14	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	24−27
medium / 1080p	14−16	14−16
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
medium / 768p	30−33	27−30
high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p	95−100	95−100
medium / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−35	30−35
high / 768p	50−55	50−55
GRID M10 8Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	GRID M10 8Q	Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture	Maxwell	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name	GM107	Kaby Lake GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	18 May 2016	1 September 2017
Pipelines	640	48
Core clock speed	1033 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock	1306 MHz	1200 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	52.24	50.40
Floating-point performance	1,672 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	5.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID M10 8Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares