GRID M60 2Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
In this comparison between GRID M60 2Q and Iris Plus Graphics 655 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 2Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 2Q
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 2Q | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 257 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 128% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 2Q | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | GM204 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 September 2017 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |