Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs P106 090
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and P106 090, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 655 stacks up against P106 090, check out specs charts below.
P106 090
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | P106 090 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 090 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and P106 090 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and P106 090 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 1054 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and P106 090 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and P106 090 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | P106 090 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Pascal |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 31 July 2017 |
Pipelines | 48 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 73.49 |
Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |