Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro 2000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro 2000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro 2000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro 2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro 2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 or Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Quadro 2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 2000M has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro 2000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro 2000M is 250 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
1−2
medium / 1080p
16−18
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
190−200
60−65
medium / 768p
160−170
27−30
ultra / 1080p
85−90
7−8
QHD / 1440p
45−50
−
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
120−130
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
100−110
45−50
medium / 768p
85−90
10−11
ultra / 1080p
55−60
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
30−35
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
85−90
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 295% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
0−1
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
24−27
0−1
low / 768p
75−80
18−20
medium / 768p
65−70
−
high / 1080p
24−27
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
8−9
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
95−100
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 720p
50−55
8−9
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 768p
45−50
0−1
medium / 768p
27−30
−
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 768p
95−100
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
14−16
ultra / 1080p
30−35
0−1
high / 768p
50−55
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Quadro 2000M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Fermi
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2017
22 February 2011
Pipelines
48
192
Core clock speed
300 MHz
550 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
17.60
Floating-point performance
422.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.103
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price