Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro CX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro CX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro CX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro CX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 302 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 314% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 180% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Quadro CX vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GT 645M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics