Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K1000M

    When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro K1000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro K1000M.
    Iris Plus Graphics 655 Check Price
    Quadro K1000M Check Price

    Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro K1000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro K1000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 or Quadro K1000M here:

    Iris Plus Graphics 655 Laptops
    Quadro K1000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 655 Quadro K1000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-A (3.0)
    Memory type DDR3/DDR4 DDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro K1000M has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 12−14 0−1
    ultra / 1080p 7−8 −
    QHD / 1440p 2−3 0−1
    low / 720p 27−30 1−2
    medium / 1080p 16−18 0−1
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Quadro K1000M.

    Full Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 655 Quadro K1000M
    Architecture Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake Kepler
    Code name Kaby Lake GT3e N14P-Q1
    Type Laptop Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 September 2017 1 June 2012
    Pipelines 48 192
    Core clock speed 300 MHz 850 MHz
    Boost Clock 1200 MHz
    Transistor count 189 million 1,270 million
    Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 50.40 13.60
    Floating-point performance 326.4 gflops
    Memory bus width 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s
    Shared memory + -
    DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 6.4 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 2.1 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.103 1.1.126
    CUDA +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 10 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Optimus +
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares