Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro M3000M

    When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro M3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro M3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Iris Plus Graphics 655 Check Price
    Quadro M3000M Check Price

    Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro M3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro M3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 or Quadro M3000M here:

    Iris Plus Graphics 655 Laptops
    Quadro M3000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 655 Quadro M3000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type DDR3/DDR4 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro M3000M has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 750 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 12−14 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 7−8 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 2−3 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 27−30 60−65
    medium / 1080p 16−18 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.

    Full Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 655 Quadro M3000M
    Architecture Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake Maxwell
    Code name Kaby Lake GT3e GM204
    Type Laptop Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 September 2017 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 48 1,024
    Core clock speed 300 MHz 1050 MHz
    Boost Clock 1200 MHz
    Transistor count 189 million 5,200 million
    Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 50.40 67.20
    Floating-point performance 2,150 gflops
    Memory bus width 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 5000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 160 GB/s
    Shared memory + -
    DirectX 12 (12_1) 12
    Shader Model 6.4 5.0
    OpenGL 4.6 4.5
    OpenCL 2.1 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.103 1.1.126
    CUDA 5.2
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 253 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
    Quick Sync +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares