Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon E8860
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon E8860, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 655 stacks up against Radeon E8860, check out specs charts below.
Radeon E8860
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon E8860 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 37 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon E8860 has 146% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon E8860 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon E8860 is 275 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon E8860 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon E8860 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 70% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 53% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon E8860 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Venus |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 September 2017 | 25 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |