Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon HD 4810
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 4810. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 4810. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4810
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4810 has 533% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4810 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4810 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 4810 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4810 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 295% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 4810 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | TeraScale |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | RV770 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 September 2017 | 28 May 2009 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |