Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 4850 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 1566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4850 X2 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 163% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 4850 X2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 142% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 95% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 85% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 112% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | TeraScale |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1990 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.68 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce 840A
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 295
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce 840A
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 295