Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon HD 5970
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 5970 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 5970 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 5970
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 5970 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 294 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 5970 has 1860% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 5970 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 5970 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 5970 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 5970 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 5970 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 21% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 5970 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 10% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 0% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 7% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than Radeon HD 5970. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon HD 5970. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 5970 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Hemlock |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 18 November 2009 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1600 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,154 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 58.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,320.0 gflops | |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |