Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon HD 7670A
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 7670A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 7670A.
Radeon HD 7670A
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7670A has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 7670A uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7670A is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 137% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Turks |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 5 January 2012 |
Pipelines | 48 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 14.40 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M
- Radeon HD 7670A vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Radeon HD 7670A vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon HD 6750
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 850A
- Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon HD 6750
- Radeon HD 7670A vs GeForce GTX 850A