Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon R7 M365X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon R7 M365X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 655 stacks up against Radeon R7 M365X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M365X
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 314% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 180% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 342% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R7 M365X | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Litho |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 September 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 23.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |