Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon R9 M360
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon R9 M360, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon R9 M360 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M360
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M360 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon R9 M360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 54% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Tropo |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 September 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Check Price |