Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon RX Vega 11
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon RX Vega 11 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 11 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX Vega 11
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | System Shared |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 15 Watt.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon RX Vega 11 uses IGP interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - with Vega.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon RX Vega 11 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon RX Vega 11 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 16% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Vega |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 26 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 48 | 704 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1240 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 4,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | |
Shared memory | + | - |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |