Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 or Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
8−9
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
20−22
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
190−200
150−160
medium / 768p
160−170
130−140
ultra / 1080p
85−90
65−70
QHD / 1440p
45−50
35−40
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
120−130
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
85−90
65−70
ultra / 1080p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
14−16
9−10
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
85−90
70−75
medium / 1080p
45−50
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 30% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
7−8
3−4
low / 720p
45−50
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
low / 768p
75−80
60−65
medium / 768p
65−70
50−55
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
high / 1080p
8−9
6−7
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
24−27
16−18
medium / 1080p
10−12
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
95−100
85−90
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
16−18
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
low / 768p
45−50
30−35
medium / 768p
27−30
21−24
high / 1080p
16−18
10−12
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
high / 768p
50−55
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Vega
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Vega Raven Ridge
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
1 September 2017
26 October 2017
Pipelines
48
512
Core clock speed
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1200 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.103
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
