Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1486% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 29% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Fermi |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K4100M
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Tesla C2070 vs Quadro K4100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost