Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Tesla M60
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Tesla M60, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Tesla M60.
Tesla M60
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 1900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M60 is 257 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 192% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 186% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 194% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 139% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 130% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 230% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 153% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 190% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |