FirePro V4900 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
When comparing FirePro V4900 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V4900 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - in Laptops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
9−10
ultra / 1080p
1−2
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
4−5
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Battlefield 5 is 137% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
110−120
160−170
medium / 768p
90−95
130−140
ultra / 1080p
40−45
65−70
QHD / 1440p
24−27
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
65−70
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
70−75
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
4−5
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
50−55
70−75
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 70% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 112% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
60−65
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
6−7
ultra / 1080p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
5−6
18−20
medium / 1080p
3−4
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
60−65
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 47% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
30−35
medium / 768p
10−11
21−24
high / 1080p
5−6
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
14−16
24−27
high / 768p
30−33
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 26% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Turks
Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 November 2011
28 May 2019
Pipelines
480
48
Core clock speed
800 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
