FirePro V5900 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5900
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - in Laptops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro V5900 is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
9−10
ultra / 1080p
2−3
5−6
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
7−8
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 71% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V5900 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
160−170
medium / 768p
100−110
130−140
ultra / 1080p
50−55
65−70
QHD / 1440p
24−27
35−40
4K / 2160p
12−14
27−30
high / 768p
75−80
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 21% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
24−27
medium / 1080p
7−8
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
7−8
18−20
ultra / 1080p
0−1
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 46% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
−
55−60
high / 1080p
10−11
18−20
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
3−4
6−7
ultra / 1080p
1−2
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
10−11
18−20
medium / 1080p
4−5
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
16−18
medium / 1080p
9−10
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
20−22
30−35
medium / 768p
12−14
21−24
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
50−55
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
high / 768p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 26% more, than FirePro V5900.
Full Specs
FirePro V5900
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Cayman
Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
24 May 2011
28 May 2019
Pipelines
512
48
Core clock speed
600 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
Floating-point performance
614.4 gflops
Length
230 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
