FirePro W4190M vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
When comparing FirePro W4190M and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4190M and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W4190M and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W4190M and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M or Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - in Laptops.
FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
9−10
ultra / 1080p
1−2
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
5−6
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
7−8
14−16
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W4190M and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
160−170
medium / 768p
95−100
130−140
ultra / 1080p
45−50
65−70
QHD / 1440p
24−27
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
70−75
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
24−27
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
27−30
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 27% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
5−6
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 47% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
20−22
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
60−65
medium / 768p
−
55−60
high / 1080p
8−9
18−20
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
2−3
6−7
ultra / 1080p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
7−8
18−20
medium / 1080p
3−4
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
65−70
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 31% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
16−18
30−35
medium / 768p
12−14
21−24
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
16−18
24−27
high / 768p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FirePro W4190M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Architecture
GCN
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Mars XTX?
Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
12 November 2015
28 May 2019
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
825 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1100 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price