FirePro W7100 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
When choosing between FirePro W7100 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7100 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
FirePro W7100
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 620 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 270% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 158% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Tonga | Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 690
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 690
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 950A
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 960A