GeForce 825M vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
In this comparison between GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 825M will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 825M and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M or Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
2−3
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
55−60
160−170
medium / 768p
30−33
130−140
ultra / 1080p
6−7
65−70
QHD / 1440p
−
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
18−20
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 321% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
55−60
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
70−75
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 127% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
70−75
medium / 1080p
0−1
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
18−20
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
−
55−60
high / 1080p
0−1
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
high / 1080p
60−65
95−100
ultra / 1080p
50−55
85−90
medium / 1080p
75−80
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
10−11
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−11
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 200% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
0−1
30−35
medium / 768p
−
21−24
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
16−18
50−55
ultra / 1080p
0−1
24−27
high / 768p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 825M.
Full Specs
GeForce 825M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
GK208
Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
27 January 2014
28 May 2019
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
850 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
1100 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
30.11
Floating-point performance
722.7 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price