GeForce GT 755M vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
In this comparison between GeForce GT 755M and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 755M will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 755M and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GT 755M and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M or Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 680 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
9−10
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GT 755M and Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
160−170
medium / 768p
110−120
130−140
ultra / 1080p
55−60
65−70
QHD / 1440p
30−35
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
27−30
high / 768p
85−90
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−11
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
low / 720p
65−70
70−75
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 13% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
medium / 768p
50−55
55−60
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
5−6
6−7
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
18−20
medium / 1080p
7−8
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
95−100
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
16−18
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 9% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
27−30
30−35
medium / 768p
18−20
21−24
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
high / 768p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
N14P-
Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
25 June 2013
28 May 2019
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
980 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
31.36
Floating-point performance
752.6 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price
