Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 6200, check out specs charts below.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU or Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type
DDR4
System Shared
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−12
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
160−170
110−120
medium / 768p
130−140
85−90
ultra / 1080p
65−70
40−45
QHD / 1440p
35−40
24−27
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
100−110
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
70−75
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
10−12
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
4K / 2160p
4−5
3−4
low / 720p
24−27
12−14
medium / 1080p
12−14
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
low / 720p
70−75
50−55
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 54% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
9−10
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 69% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
60−65
40−45
medium / 768p
55−60
35−40
high / 1080p
18−20
8−9
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
3−4
ultra / 1080p
4−5
2−3
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
8−9
medium / 1080p
8−9
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
high / 1080p
95−100
80−85
ultra / 1080p
85−90
70−75
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
8−9
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
30−35
16−18
medium / 768p
21−24
12−14
high / 1080p
12−14
7−8
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
90−95
80−85
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
high / 768p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
28 May 2019
2 June 2015
Pipelines
48
48
Core clock speed
300 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1150 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
Shared memory
+
+
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
