Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Quadro 2000D
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Quadro 2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | Quadro 2000D | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 78% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 15% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | Quadro 2000D | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Fermi |
Code name | Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11 | GF106 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 28 May 2019 | 5 October 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Quadro 2000D vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Quadro 2000D vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs HD Graphics 530
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro 2000D vs HD Graphics 530
- Quadro 2000D vs GeForce 830M