Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Radeon Pro 460
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Radeon Pro 460, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU stacks up against Radeon Pro 460, check out specs charts below.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 75% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
160−170
220−230
medium / 768p
130−140
190−200
ultra / 1080p
65−70
100−110
QHD / 1440p
35−40
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
100−110
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
70−75
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 91% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
110−120
medium / 1080p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 67% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
16−18
30−33
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−12
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
60−65
95−100
medium / 768p
55−60
85−90
high / 1080p
18−20
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
30−35
60−65
medium / 768p
21−24
40−45
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 81% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Polaris
Code name
Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
28 May 2019
8 August 2016
Pipelines
48
1024
Core clock speed
300 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
907 MHz
Transistor count
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
58.05
Floating-point performance
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
