Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Radeon R7 A265
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A265
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Battlefield 5 is 185% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 95% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 87% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 40% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11 | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 28 May 2019 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics