Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Radeon R9 M270X
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Radeon R9 M270X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Radeon R9 M270X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M270X
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 24% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11 | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 28 May 2019 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370