FirePro W7100 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
In this comparison between FirePro W7100 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7100 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7100
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 620 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 123% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 152% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Tonga | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 690
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs GeForce GTX 690
- FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R7 360
- FirePro W7100 vs Radeon HD 7790
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R7 360
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 7790