FireStream 9250 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
FireStream 9250
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 325 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 211% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 65% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 260% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 129% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 163% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | RV770 | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 800 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs GeForce GT 650M
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon R7 360
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 7790
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R7 360
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 7790