GeForce GT 445M vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
In this comparison between GeForce GT 445M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 445M will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 445M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GT 445M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 445M or Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 445M
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GT 445M is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 445M is 880 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
GeForce GT 445M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
10−11
27−30
medium / 1080p
1−2
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
10−11
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 500% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 445M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
110−120
200−210
medium / 768p
80−85
170−180
ultra / 1080p
30−35
90−95
QHD / 1440p
−
50−55
4K / 2160p
9−10
30−33
high / 768p
55−60
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
low / 768p
70−75
100−110
medium / 768p
40−45
90−95
ultra / 1080p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 95% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
high / 1080p
1−2
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
2−3
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
1−2
16−18
low / 720p
45−50
90−95
medium / 1080p
5−6
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 193% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
4−5
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 433% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
low / 768p
40−45
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
2−3
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
medium / 720p
30−35
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
high / 1080p
0−1
9−10
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
1−2
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 2700% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
55−60
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
3−4
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 733% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
low / 768p
5−6
50−55
medium / 768p
5−6
30−35
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 750% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
low / 768p
70−75
100−105
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−35
high / 768p
27−30
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 67% more, than GeForce GT 445M.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 445M
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
N11E-GE
Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
3 September 2010
28 May 2019
Pipelines
144
64
Core clock speed
1180 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
10.6 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
339.8 gflops
Memory bus width
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth
60.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
144
SLI options
+
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price