GeForce GTX 285 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
When choosing between GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 285 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 1176 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
16−18
27−30
medium / 1080p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
200−210
medium / 768p
110−120
170−180
ultra / 1080p
55−60
90−95
QHD / 1440p
30−35
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
85−90
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
90−95
ultra / 1080p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
8−9
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
60−65
90−95
medium / 1080p
24−27
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
18−20
QHD / 1440p
1−2
8−9
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
80−85
medium / 768p
45−50
70−75
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
5−6
9−10
ultra / 1080p
3−4
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
27−30
medium / 1080p
7−8
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
90−95
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
30−35
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
24−27
50−55
medium / 768p
16−18
30−35
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
85−90
100−105
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
30−35
high / 768p
35−40
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
GT200B
Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
23 December 2008
28 May 2019
Pipelines
240
64
Core clock speed
1476 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
51.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
708.5 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
512 Bit
Memory clock speed
1242 MHz
Memory bandwidth
159.0 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
4.0
OpenGL
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Quick Sync
+
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price
