GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 v2 stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 479 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | GF114 | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 September 2011 | 28 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 64 |
| Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.62 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R7 360
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon HD 7790
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R7 360
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 7790