GeForce GTX 850A vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
When choosing between GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
GeForce GTX 850A
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 602 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
- GeForce GTX 850A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 850A and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 143% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 255% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | GM107 | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 28 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 64 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.44 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon HD 7670A
- GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce 840M
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 7670A
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs GeForce 840M
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon R7 360
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon HD 7790
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R7 360
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 7790