Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs NVS 810
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU and NVS 810 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU will be the best choice, for others NVS 810 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is used in Laptops, and NVS 810 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 602 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and NVS 810 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
2−3
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
12−14
medium / 1080p
16−18
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
45−50
16−18
medium / 1080p
24−27
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
low / 768p
200−210
120−130
medium / 768p
170−180
95−100
ultra / 1080p
90−95
40−45
QHD / 1440p
50−55
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−33
16−18
high / 768p
130−140
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
35−40
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
100−110
80−85
medium / 768p
90−95
45−50
ultra / 1080p
60−65
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 72% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
16−18
2−3
ultra / 1080p
14−16
2−3
4K / 2160p
5−6
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
10−12
medium / 1080p
16−18
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
21−24
10−11
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
90−95
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 143% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
24−27
5−6
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
8−9
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
45−50
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 188% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
27−30
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−12
2−3
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
4−5
medium / 1080p
12−14
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−110
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 28% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
24−27
6−7
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
10−11
medium / 768p
30−35
8−9
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
100−105
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 58% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
NVS 810
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Maxwell
Code name
Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
GM107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
28 May 2019
4 November 2015
Pipelines
64
512
Core clock speed
300 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1033 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
10 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
33.06
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
198 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
